I think it is more useful over the Canon 15-35mm f/2.8. I would rather have 14mm than f/2.8. The new Canon mirrorless models have great noise performance and I would not be concerned bumping up the ISO to compensate for that drop from f/2.8 to f/4. That’s a personal decision though, and you might find opting for the 15-35mm f/2.8 (which is excellent) makes more sense.
What’s the downside?
Well, like all of the R cameras and RF lenses, Canon’s pricing has been at a premium. This lens is available now for preorder at $1,699.00. That’s almost unheard of for a ‘f/4’ lens. Especially when you can find used EF 16-35 f/4 models that you can adapt for under $1,000.
This lens should be perfect though if the price tag doesn’t deter you. I’m excited to test this lens in the field but I assume it is optically perfect, like all of the RF lenses. The wider mount and flange distance implemented by both Canon and Nikon has allowed them to make some of the best lenses we’ve ever seen.
And it just means more exciting things in store for the future – we’re getting really unique and useful zooms and primes. For instance, this is the first 14-35mm f/4 and Canon’s announcing a RF 70-400mm soon as well.
I will be stacking this lens up against the Nikon 14-30mm f/4 when the Canon 14-35mm f/4 is released late summer/early fall to test performance. I expect the new Canon 14-35mm f/4 to be better, but it is also $600 more.
Outside of the great zoom range, there are a few other things that make this lens standout.
One, it’s compact size. This lens weighs 1.2 lbs and is around 3” x 4”, so it is very small and portable. It will free up weight in your pack and make a difference if you hike or backpack.
I will say, that’s impressive for a lens hitting 14mm on the wide end and 35mm on the long end.
I highlighted it already, but it takes 77mm filters. That means you can thread on your ever-so useful polarizer or ND filter without the need for extra holders or accessories.
These next few things separate it from the Nikon 14-30mm f/4.
It has a minimum focusing of 7.9 inches at all focal lengths. Why does that make a difference? It can be super useful for more advanced landscape techniques like focus stacking. It means you can get really close to foreground elements and still have the nearest element, like a flower, be in focus. For comparison, the 14-30mm f/4 from Nikon has a minimum distance of 11 inches.
The next big thing, it features image stabilization. The lens features 5.5 stops of stabilization, AND it can be combined with EOS R cameras for a maximum 7 stops of stabilization. That’s insane and means you will be able to handhold a R5 with this lens at really slow shutter speeds – I’m excited to test.
The Nikon 14-30mm f/4 relies on in-body stabilization, so around 5-stops depending on what Z series camera you’re using.
Overall, this will be phenomenal lens. It will be a little before we see true performance tests, but I really think it will be excellent and compete as one of the best wide-angle zooms.